So Cal, Leeds, Gainesville and Central Kentucky among 13 new WFTDA apprentice leagues
login | register
Enter your Derby News Network username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.

you forgot it?!?

Boston Glides Past Bay Area, 129-58

Bay Area's Chantilly Mace gets hung up by jammer defense from Boston's Krushpuppy. Photo: Apron.This article is reposted with permission from Veronica La Rosa's original Examiner article.

LAS VEGAS, NV --The Boston Derby Dames all-star travel team, The Boston Massacre, truly lived up to their name last weekend. On July 31st, they took on the B.ay A.rea D.erby Girls at the Las Vegas Sports Center and Boston skated away with a monstrous 129 - 58 win.

Though the two teams had never met each other in a bout before, they were both officially ranked #5 in their respective regions by the WFTDA. Although many in the audience expected a close game, the tone was set for a slaughter in the very first jam when Boston jammer Claire D. Way scored 14 points while B.A.D.'s jammer Sassy Slayher scored just three. By the sixth jam, Boston held a commanding 47 - 9 lead. Last year, the B.ay A.rea D.erby Girls famously pulled themselves out of a 54 - 9 hole against the Rat City Roller Girls to bring the score to a much closer 93 - 88 loss. However, such a comeback was not in the cards for the Northern California team on Saturday night. At halftime, Boston had the lead with a 75 - 22 and by the end of the night, they took home the win.          

Both teams had a lot of difficulty navigating the particularly slippery concrete floor at the Las Vegas Sports Center. Although the floor was coated with a mixture of sugar and water to create more traction, skaters from both teams had to borrow stickier wheels from nearby vendors for the game. At times, the slick floor looked downright dangerous. There were more than a few times where a jam was called because a player had been taken down and was slow to get up.

However, Boston seemed to have a slight advantage adapting, perhaps in part due to playing on a polished concrete floor at home in the Shriners' Auditiorium. They did seem to have more control on the tricky surface.

One thing that really hampered the Bay Area offense was their plethora of jammer majors. B.A.D. jammers were sent to the box no less than nine times throughout the game while Boston only had three jammer trips to the box.  Also hurting the team were the blocker penalties. In the very first jam, every B.A.D. player on the track went to the penalty box except for one, and that trend continued throughout the night. Liza Machete was ejected before the end of the first period for too many trips to the penalty box.

Boston, on the other hand, played a very deliberate and at times devious strategy. They often engaged in jammer on jammer defense as well as slowing the packs down to almost a complete stop. More than once, a chorus of audience boos rang out from the bleachers as the crowd tried to spur a more aggressive strategy -- however, with Boston's gameplan working very effectively, they had little impetus to change it.

The Boston Massacre employed four jammers to guarantee their victory. Most of the scoring was done by Sugar Hits (41 points in 12 jams), KrushPuppy (46 points in 10 jams), and Claire D. Way (37 points in 10 jams). Maura Buse stepped on to the jammer line four times. Although she received lead jammer status three times of her four attempts, she earned herself only five points.

Similarly, the B.A.D. Girls also had three primary scoring jammers; Burly Bot (30 points in 11 jams), Sassy Slayher (12 points in 12 jams), and Nock Nock (11 points in nine jams). Chantilly Mace jammed four times and was awarded five points for her efforts.

These teams are not scheduled to play each other again this season and they are unlikely to meet at Nationals in Philadelphia later this year. Both are in action quite soon, though: on August 8th, Bay Area will be playing Portland's Rose City Rollers in San Francisco. On August 15th, Boston will be taking on the Detroit Derby Girls at home.

Photo: Apron

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Borrowing wheels...

One thing I've read (on the awesome loaded-with-skate-nerds SkateLog Forum's roller derby board) is that new wheels tend to be MORE slippery until you wear the sealant off of the surface.

I recall a skater there suggesting that about 300 laps ought to get a new set of wheels into good condition. Not that I'd know.

-Barely even speaking for myself...
*~[
Grand Poobah
DerbyMatic/DNN
The Inner Loopers
Roc City Roller Derby

new wheels covering

going outside and doing a couple T Stops on the sidewalk will get rid of that in 5 minutes.

Gliding

The league that I coach skates on concrete that is considered by some to be a little on the slick side. I've also skated on Boston's floor and have to say that the surface is actually quite grippy and fast as polished concrete goes.

The floor at the LVSC was unlike anything anyone had ever skated on before. I spoke with dozens of people (including well-seasoned derby players, world champion speed skaters, and people who've been just plain skating all over for thirty years) and to a person, everyone I talked to said they'd never skated on anything so slick, ever.

I'd say no less than a third (conservatively) of the skaters at Rollercon purchased Sugar or Shadow wheels for the surface at LVSC. They seemed to be the only wheels that worked at all on that surface.

I had a popular brand of outdoor wheels and I couldn't stand up on those, but when I got the Shadows, I got *some* grip (in other words, I could actually stay on my feet and sort of cross over every once in a while).

As Dahmernatrix suggested, I went out to the parking lot for about five minutes and skated all around to rough the new Shadows up first and they were great (comparatively). I'd also borrowed Val Capone's Sugars and they were every bit as effective (not to mention they saved my sanity--Thanks, Val!).

Anyway, to say that one team or the other had any kind of "advantage" on that floor is really not accurate. Pretty much EVERYONE had to significantly adjust their style to skate on that surface, regardless of the wheels. I have to say, though, it was super-freaking-awesomely-uber-cool that Sin City provided those wheels for the WFTDA bout skaters, so we could get to see a good matchup.

In my humble opinion, the difference in this bout was the shutdown blocking of Shelby Shattered.

It takes an average of 15

It takes an average of 15 minutes for me to break in wheels -- more if they're firm, and less if they're soft.

Devious? Wow.

Most people call jammer on jammer defense fun to watch and consider pack awareness & speed control critical derby skills to constantly improve on.

However, Boston seemed to have a slight advantage adapting, perhaps in part due to playing on a polished concrete floor at home in the Shriners' Auditiorium. They did seem to have more control on the tricky surface.

Shriner's isn't slippery, its hard enough to be fast, but has enough grip to stay controlled. Its pretty nice. However, our winter practice spaces have very smooth polished wood floors, that are very slick. I'm sure that experience helped the team adapt.

archived footage here: http://www.justin.tv/search?section=highlights&sort-by=newest&q=bay%20ar...

thanks for lending the wheels, sin city.

Anna
Boston Massacre: The pantsless wonders of Massachusetts

"at times devious strategy"?

Are you suggesting there was something not on the level about how Boston played?

--
#49 Boston Derby Dames

While I think some people do

While I think some people do consider things like stopping on the track to be outside of "on the level" I took the article's use of the word devious to mean cunning.

semantics

What's considered devious when your preferred team is being thwarted by it becomes smart strategy when your preferred team is using it to their advantage.

--
#49 Boston Derby Dames

Just to be clear

We have no excuses! We were out skated.

Taxi Scab
Co-Captain
B.ay A.rea D.erby Girls All-Stars

Mad Props!

to BOTH teams for playing a great game. Floor issues aside, both teams played a great bout - and I'm glad I was there to see it. Congrats Boston on the win!

Wheels - I bought the Shadows and as soon as I got them on my skates - went outside and skated around for a few minutes in the parking lot - did the trick. Kept them clean while at R'con - really no issues.

For that floor - yeah it was slick - but like anything, you make adjustments and keep on trucking - key to to skating on slick floors - shorten your stride and make your crossovers quicker.

We skate on a slick, non-coated wood floor. Yep - we slide out on the corners - but we adjust, deal with it and play hard.

Play any time, any where, on any surface, and you won't have to worry about the small stuff.

Hooah!Girl
DC Rollergirls

Oh come on

"The floor at the LVSC was unlike anything anyone had ever skated on before"

Not to be disrespectful, but that's a little bit of an overstatement. Flamingo Banks was easily just as slippery before we painted it (RC05 and 06) and the Cashman convention center we played at was (in my memory anyway) even more hideously slippery for RC06 or 07 the Atlanta / Sin City game. The Albuquerque Santa Ana Star Center Duke venue (think just as slippery but with a BONUS of a fine rain of even more slippery dust coming down from the windstorm the whole bout) was much much much worse, in my opinion. Sometimes floors are slippery!

Its interesting to me to see how quickly teams can adjust to unfamiliar and sometimes awful circumstances ("bad" floors, inconsistent reffing, weather, jet lag, multiple games in a row, injuries to starting lineups, players unable to travel, etc). Sucks when its your own team, but it happens to everyone eventually. It makes sense to acknowledge those things as factors, but it sucks when comments like that border on robbing the winning team of the credit they deserve for their victory. It was unfamiliar and slippery for both teams. They both played well in spite of it.

I also think that makes Taxi's comment even more awesome of her.

Revision

It was not my intention to make an overstatement regarding the floor at Rollercon, and I'm sure that the awesome volunteers who pull off Rollercon are sick of hearing about that floor by now, so I apologize for adding another warble to the peanut gallery.

The floor was crazy slick. Everyone I personally talked to said it was the slickest floor they'd ever skated on. I didn't talk to everyone who skated on it, so I shouldn't have overstated. I apologize.

Everyone I personally talked to had a blast at Rollercon thanks to all those awesome volunteers who work their butts off to keep Rollercon rolling.

Regarding the game, as I said in my previous post, I think the difference in the game was kick@$$ blocking, not the floor.

The best team on that day won the game, in my opinion.

Ok so you don't like "Devious"...

As the person who wrote this re-cap, I've been debating recently whether or not I should address my choice of words. It seems like "devious" caught some peoples attention and they don't like it. The first thing I wanted to say is that I want to remind people that I'm not affiliated with DNN officially and that I'm a blogger, not a journalist. I'm not particularly good at being completely objective and unbiased although I am working on that.

The problem with the word "Devious" in the sentence above is that it doesn't really fit in the context. The original sentence had some other um....controversial observations, I'll say, that DNN wisely edited out. So did I think slowing the pack was devious itself? No, not really. Would you be even more annoyed if you read the full sentence? Probably. Have I changed my mind about what I originally wrote*? A little bit.

In closing, I'm sorry if my choice of words offended any skaters for Boston. I've got my opinions. I'm sure everyone has their opinions on every team out there. Sometimes they're spot-on, sometimes they're not justified. And if anyone gets mad, please message me. I'm a nice girl. I'm not a derby-hater. And I like talking derby to people and bouncing differing opinions off of other people. :)

-Killer Vee

*The unedited article is linked under the byline if you're curious.

question...

Just curious, but why does it say that these two teams are unlikely to meet at nationals? I know that both teams have stiff regional competition, but I keep thinking that the more that all of these top leagues get better the closer and closer the games are getting. It doesn't seem so far-fetched to me that we are approaching a time when a team could just have a really great weekend of derby playing and then play the following weekend (or even the following day) and lose to the same teams they just got done beating.

Anyway, I'm sure we all have our predictions about who's going to Nationals but this year just seems especially exciting and neck and neck to me.

Well...

I think it is reasonable to say a Boston / Bay Area meeting at Nationals is unlikely.

To get to Nationals, Bay Area has to -- at a minimum -- definitely beat Rat City and then beat (most likely) Oly to get to the finals, OR Denver or Rose in the third place match (and Bay Area has already lost to two of those teams this year.)

On the other side, Boston has to definitely beat Carolina, and then beat (most likely) Gotham, OR Charm City or Philly in the third place match (and Boston has already lost to all four of those teams this year.)

Even if all those things happen, since East 1 and 3 are on one side of the Nationals bracket and West 1 and 3 on the other side, it's still unlikely they'll meet at Nationals unless both of them make it to the finals.

Of course, on the other hand, we can probably count on one hand the amount of people who expected Kansas City to win 2007 Nationals, or the amount of people who expected Duke City to get to 2008 Nationals... so, as they say, it's anybody's game.

JFM

14 Fingers Each

Justice Feelgood Marshall wrote:

Of course, on the other hand, we can probably count on one hand the amount of people who expected Kansas City to win 2007 Nationals, or the amount of people who expected Duke City to get to 2008 Nationals... so, as they say, it's anybody's game.

I'd be willing to bet you'd actually need at least 14 fingers to count the amount of people who expected Kansas City to win 2007 Nationals and 14 for Duke City '08, as well. ;)

Fair enough

Thanks for the explanation!